Thursday, 19 November 2009

Are We Safe Or Are We Sorry?

Isn’t it a bit queer, that the more criminals we take out of society, the more measures against crime are needed?

According to those that study our ancestors, the brain of modern man has not changed physiologically for thousands of years. It’s therefore plausible that the proportion of ‘bad’ people in society should be a constant throughout the centuries; and due to evolutionary selection, that proportion would be minimal. Therefore a society becomes evil not through the composition of its people, but via the choice of its politics. Our prisons are over full, not because there are more bad men, but due to degenerate politics.

Ask the mediaeval Popes, Stalin, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot, Goebbels, or Harriet Harman, and they would probably tell you: the best way to control the people with minimum resources is to persuade them to fear each other. In an evil society we fear innocence and celebrate guilt; through the agency of false-witness: man denounces man; wife denounces husband; child denounces parent; whilst schools prescribe Ritalin, and proscribe erudition.

The people are coached on what to say, do, and think, by the scriptwriters of “EastEnders” and “The Jeremy Kyle Show”, as they chum the waters with cultural discord. The enemy of false-witness, and the champions of truth, are free men; so it’s natural that our police, who are armed to the teeth and ready for war, will pursue them with extreme prejudice; and inevitably truth itself will be a collateral casualty.

Wightmen must wake-up and smell the oestrogen; liberty is being poisoned in the cradle, left begging at the dole queue, and sent to rot in the prisons. For evil is not the shame of bad people doing bad things, it is the political agency that goads good men to do bad justice.